Hi everyone! We're hard at work trying to keep our community clean, so if you see any spam, please report it here and we'll review ASAP!  Thanks a million!
2,539 Users Online
  • 206,081,782 Downloads
  • 1,871,592 Wallpapers
  • 6,933,734 Members
  • 14,834,767 Votes
  • 7,291,060 Favorites
Upload Wallpapers

Categories

View All (15,745)
Airfields (480)
Antique (2,236)
Blimps (55)
Commercial (2,410)
Concepts (127)
Gliders (42)
Helicopters (853)
Hot Air Balloons (377)
Military (7,923)
Missiles (56)
Private Planes (447)
Space (Link)
Other (740)
Downloads: 206,081,782
Aircraft Walls: 13,386
All Wallpapers: 1,871,592
Tag Count: 356,266
Comments: 2,140,956
Members: 6,933,734
Votes: 14,834,767

2,539 Guests and 0 Members Online

Most users ever online was 19580 on 12/21/25.
Get your weekly helping of fresh wallpapers!

Leave us feedback!
Support This Site

Comments for "INDIA AND RUSSIA - PAK-FA FIGHTER JET"

addythakur
addythakur Jul 13, 2011 1:35pm
Remember Operation Eagle Claw & 1967 USS Forrestal fire. There's no use of technology if its not used properly.
In Vietnam war US Navy used old bombs which led then to big massacre of their own people.
addythakur
addythakur Jul 13, 2011 1:18pm
Also read about the Indo-Pak war, India bought small cheap planes & Pak had latest US planes, but they failed, especially the Sabre failed facing GNAT.
addythakur
addythakur Jul 13, 2011 1:11pm
The Americans are over confident about their military. Dont remember Black Hawk Down, u had advanced helicopters but then too u failed. Recently in afghanistan the new black hawk who's engine didnt make any noise, fell down near that most wanted terrorists home. F-22 Raptor is not used in war yet, so cant say its better. U have good technologies but they fail due to very small reasons. Nighthawk stealth fighter crashed on a residence just because a nut was missing, US army could'nt capture a single stinger site in afghanistan they were defending themselves for more than one day, that time a US army personnel told that they r always offensive., so they could'nt defend themselves properly ( this was aired on NGC). USA & Russia have good technologies but Russians have cheaper than USA, thats the reason the B-2 bomber is so costly to sell to other nations. This was also told on a show aired on Discovery. Any country can give their best technologies, just we need to use it in a proper way.
Googlehead
Googlehead May 17, 2011 9:33am
You tell em Hotrod! The Raptor is unmatched by any bird!!!
hotrod44
hotrod44 Dec 15, 2010 10:10am
i don't agree! > India PAK-FA program developed a stealth fighter capable of defeating the american F22 Raptor. and even if its is (= ) to the f/a-22 which i don't believe it is, its about 20yrs newer,which means nothing because the body is ment to be upgrades block, i heard Northrop Grumman Completes Successful Demonstration of a new radar for the new block
Quake
Quake Sep 21, 2009 10:24am
Awesome aircraft, pity it doesn't work properly!
akerman777
akerman777 Sep 6, 2009 1:15am
very cool , go to favorites
akerman777
akerman777 Sep 5, 2009 1:54am
very interesting project.but for this time the USA already will have f42 or f43))))
ShamROCKS
ShamROCKS Jul 17, 2009 2:25am
Killer wallpaper. I'll make it mine.
Daimoth
Daimoth Jul 16, 2009 4:09am
Again, this is nonsense. Even if this plane did see service, it'd still be decades behind the F-22 and F-35. The US spends over 10x as much as Russia does. There's really no comparison.

It's a neat design. But the Russian Federation is lagging behind hard in military technology since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Tigerkaetzchen
Tigerkaetzchen Jul 9, 2009 9:06pm
cool plane but i agree i have read something and it is not clear that this plane ever see service because of many problems with the vector trusters ....but the pic is awesome love and favor it ...♥BUSSI♥ Melanie
egregious1
egregious1 Jul 9, 2009 10:22am
I though was movin in the direction of the su-47 berkut. I seriously dought that this fighter will ever see service. cool design though